From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Pinero

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Apr 6, 2016
138 A.D.3d 763 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

04-06-2016

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Frank PINERO, appellant.

Mark Diamond, New York, N.Y., for appellant. Thomas P. Zugibe, District Attorney, New City, N.Y. (Itamar J. Yeger of counsel), for respondent.


Mark Diamond, New York, N.Y., for appellant.

Thomas P. Zugibe, District Attorney, New City, N.Y. (Itamar J. Yeger of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Rockland County (Nelson, J.), rendered October 1, 2014, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's waiver of his right to appeal was knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently made (see People v. Sanders, 25 N.Y.3d 337, 12 N.Y.S.3d 593, 34 N.E.3d 344; People v. Ramos, 7 N.Y.3d 737, 738, 819 N.Y.S.2d 853, 853 N.E.2d 222; People v. Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 256, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145). The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal forecloses appellate review of his challenge to the factual sufficiency of his plea allocution (see People v. Towns, 135 A.D.3d 974, 22 N.Y.S.3d 914; People v. Nash, 38 A.D.3d 684, 832 N.Y.S.2d 593).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.

LEVENTHAL, J.P., MILLER, MALTESE and DUFFY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Pinero

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Apr 6, 2016
138 A.D.3d 763 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

People v. Pinero

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Frank PINERO, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 6, 2016

Citations

138 A.D.3d 763 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
138 A.D.3d 763
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 2670

Citing Cases

People v. Thompson

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed. Contrary to the defendant's contention, the record demonstrates that…

People v. Thompson

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the record demonstrates that he knowingly, voluntarily, and…