From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Phillips

Supreme Court of California
Oct 1, 1872
45 Cal. 44 (Cal. 1872)

Opinion

         Appeal from the County Court of Los Angeles County.

         The defendant was convicted of an assault with intent to commit murder, under an indictment which charged the assault, and also charged an attempt to cause death by administering poison. The defendant demurred to the indictment, on the ground of duplicity, in charging two distinct offenses. The demurrer was overruled. The defendant was tried and convicted, and sentenced, and made this attempt to appeal.

         COUNSEL

          Kewen & Howard, for Appellant.

          Blanchard, for Respondent. J.H.W.P.


         OPINION          By the Court:

         It is necessary that in the transcript of the record in a criminal case filed in this Court, it should distinctly appear that an appeal has been in fact taken--otherwise no duty is cast upon us to look into the case. An appeal is to be taken by filing a notice of appeal, and serving it upon the Clerk of the Court in which the action was tried, in which notice it must be stated that the appellant appeals from the judgment. (Hitt. Genl. Laws, Sec. 2073.) When the appeal is taken by the defendant, the notice must also be served upon the District Attorney of the county in which the judgment was rendered. (Id., Sec. 2074.)

         In the transcript filed here it does not appear that any such notice was filed or served, except by way of recital in the bill of exceptions, in which it is stated that a notice of appeal had been duly given. The office of a bill of exceptions, and the matters which may be incorporated therein, are distinctly set forth in the statute. (Sec. 2020, et seq.) The filing and serving of a notice of appeal is not a matter that can be inserted therein. There would be just as much propriety in reciting it in the judgment.

         It is part of the business of the Attorney General to examine the record presented here, in order to see if it is in a condition to be submitted for determination by the Court. It is, perhaps, proper to add, to save the defendant the trouble of taking an appeal in this case, that we have thoroughly examined the record and points filed, and that no error is shown therein, which would justify a reversal of the judgment, were an appeal taken.

         Order of submission set aside, and cause stricken from the calendar.


Summaries of

People v. Phillips

Supreme Court of California
Oct 1, 1872
45 Cal. 44 (Cal. 1872)
Case details for

People v. Phillips

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE v. PHILLIPS

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Oct 1, 1872

Citations

45 Cal. 44 (Cal. 1872)

Citing Cases

People v. Swearinger

It follows that the appeal cannot be considered, and that it should be dismissed. People v. Phillips,…

People v. Finerty

People v. Colon quotes from People v. Bell, 70 Cal. 33, [11 P. 327], where it is said: 'The transcript herein…