From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Phillips

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 6, 1997
243 A.D.2d 514 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

October 6, 1997

Appeal from County Court, Orange County (Byrne, J.).


Ordered that the judgment and amended judgment are affirmed.

Although the defendant had been hospitalized on numerous occasions for treatment of mental illness and was being treated with medication therefor, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in failing to sua sponte order a competency hearing prior to accepting his admission to a violation of probation ( see, People v. Morgan, 87 N.Y.2d 878). Prior to pleading guilty to the underlying crime for which he was sentenced to probation, the court had ordered a psychiatric examination, which resulted in a finding that the defendant was not incompetent. Moreover, nothing in the record of the violation of probation proceedings indicates that the defendant was an incapacitated person ( see, CPL 730.10; People v. Rowley, 222 A.D.2d 718; People v. Hollis, 204 A.D.2d 569; People v. Polimeda, 198 A.D.2d 242; People v. Parker, 191 A.D.2d 717).

Rosenblatt, J.P., O'Brien, Thompson, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Phillips

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 6, 1997
243 A.D.2d 514 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

People v. Phillips

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. KIRK PHILLIPS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 6, 1997

Citations

243 A.D.2d 514 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
663 N.Y.S.2d 90

Citing Cases

People v. Washington

The defendant's contention that his plea of guilty was not knowing and voluntary because the plea court…

People v. Washington

The defendant's contention that his plea of guilty was not knowing and voluntary because the plea court…