From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Phifer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 4, 1991
177 A.D.2d 518 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

November 4, 1991

Appeal from the County Court, Suffolk County (Mallon, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, and a new trial is ordered. No questions of fact have been raised or considered.

The trial court erred in precluding the defense counsel from cross-examining the complainant as to his prior convictions for manslaughter and attempted assault (see, People v. McGee, 68 N.Y.2d 328; People v. English, 126 A.D.2d 738; People v. Allen, 67 A.D.2d 558, affd 50 N.Y.2d 898). On the facts of this case, the error cannot be considered harmless, and the defendant is entitled to a new trial (see, People v. Memminger, 126 A.D.2d 752; People v. Robideau, 121 A.D.2d 769; People v. Watson, 111 A.D.2d 888).

In light of the foregoing, we need not reach the defendant's remaining contentions. Mangano, P.J., Bracken, Lawrence and O'Brien, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Phifer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 4, 1991
177 A.D.2d 518 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

People v. Phifer

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JAY ROSCOE PHIFER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 4, 1991

Citations

177 A.D.2d 518 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
576 N.Y.S.2d 720

Citing Cases

People v. Whaul

Viewing the record as a whole, the defendant received meaningful representation ( see People v Baldi, 54 NY2d…