From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Perry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 8, 1998
252 A.D.2d 990 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

July 8, 1998

Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Dwyer, J. — Assault, 2nd Degree.

Present — Lawton, J. P., Wisner, Callahan, Boehm and Fallon, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that his guilty plea was not knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently made ( see, People v. Ferguson, 192 A.D.2d 800, lv denied 82 N.Y.2d 717). Defendant failed to object to the enhanced sentence or to seek to withdraw his plea or vacate the judgment of conviction based upon the imposition of the sentence. Thus, defendant's contentions concerning the enhanced sentence are not preserved for our review ( see, CPL 470.05; People v. Ramirez, 210 A.D.2d 56, lv denied 84 N.Y.2d 1037). We decline to exercise our power to address those contentions as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice ( see, CPL 470.15 [a]). The sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe.


Summaries of

People v. Perry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 8, 1998
252 A.D.2d 990 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Perry

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MICHAEL PERRY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 8, 1998

Citations

252 A.D.2d 990 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
675 N.Y.S.2d 924

Citing Cases

People v. Webb

30), defendant contends that Supreme Court erred in imposing an enhanced sentence without affording him an…

People v. Vandeviver

We conclude that the plea was voluntary despite defendant's "rote answers of `yes' or `no'" to County Court's…