From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Perez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 28, 1995
221 A.D.2d 258 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

November 28, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Joseph Cerbone, J.).


Defendant's claim that the trial court improperly admitted evidence of an uncharged crime is without merit. The police witness testified that immediately prior to the charged sale, defendant removed something from a plastic bag in a garbage pail, placed the item in his pocket, and subsequently gave something to a man who approached him in a car. Even assuming that the testimony showed the commission of an uncharged crime, the evidence was admissible to prove intent to sell, a requisite element of a charged crime, and was interwoven with the narrative of the entire incident ( People v Hernandez, 216 A.D.2d 11). We perceive no abuse of sentencing discretion.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Sullivan, Ross, Williams and Tom, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Perez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 28, 1995
221 A.D.2d 258 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Perez

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LOUIS PEREZ, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 28, 1995

Citations

221 A.D.2d 258 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
634 N.Y.S.2d 71

Citing Cases

People v. Rodriguez

Defendant's claim that the trial court improperly admitted evidence of uncharged crimes is without merit. The…

People v. Murphy

Provided its probative value outweighs the risk of undue prejudice to the defendant, a trial court may admit…