From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Pearson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 19, 2001
284 A.D.2d 202 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

June 19, 2001.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (George Daniels, J.), rendered May 18, 1999, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 5 to 10 years, unanimously affirmed.

Priscilla Steward, for respondent.

Frank J. Loss, for defendant-appellant.

Before: Sullivan, P.J., Nardelli, Ellerin, Buckley, Marlow, JJ.


Defendant's challenges to the People's cross-examination and summation are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would find that the flat contradiction between defendant's testimony and that of the police witnesses was properly explored on cross-examination and summation by asking whether defendant would characterize segments of police testimony as "lies" (see, People v. Overlee, 236 A.D.2d 133, lv denied 91 N.Y.2d 976).


Summaries of

People v. Pearson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 19, 2001
284 A.D.2d 202 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

People v. Pearson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. MICHAEL PEARSON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 19, 2001

Citations

284 A.D.2d 202 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
726 N.Y.S.2d 545

Citing Cases

People v. Enriquez

Defendant's testimony flatly contradicted the police officers' testimony in several material aspects. As the…