From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Pearson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 23, 2001
282 A.D.2d 692 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

March 13, 2001.

April 23, 2001.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ruchelsman, J.), rendered February 3, 1999, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Vivek S. Suri, Brooklyn, N.Y., and M. Sue Wycoff, New York, N Y (Kevin F. Casey of counsel), for appellant (one brief filed).

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove, Joyce Slevin, and Susan D. Settenbrino of counsel), for respondent.

Before: DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, HOWARD MILLER, NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The prosecution's cross-examination of the defendant did not exceed the scope of the court's Sandoval ruling (see, People v. Walker, 119 A.D.2d 521; see also, People v. Sandoval, 34 N.Y.2d 371).


Summaries of

People v. Pearson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 23, 2001
282 A.D.2d 692 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

People v. Pearson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., RESPONDENT v. GARY PEARSON, APPELLANT

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 23, 2001

Citations

282 A.D.2d 692 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
723 N.Y.S.2d 681

Citing Cases

People v. Hill

The defendant's contention that the prosecutor violated the Supreme Court's Sandoval ruling ( see People v…