From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Paul

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 2, 1992
592 N.E.2d 795 (N.Y. 1992)

Opinion

Decided April 2, 1992

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, George A. Reed, J.

R. Michael Tantillo, District Attorney (Kathleen H. Pohl and Jeffrey L. Taylor of counsel), for appellant.


Respondent precluded.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.4), order reversed, and case remitted to the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, for consideration of the facts and issues raised but not passed upon on the appeal to that court. Defendant expressly consented, in the presence of counsel, to waiver of the CPL 310.10 jury sequestration requirement (People v Webb, 78 N.Y.2d 335).

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges KAYE, HANCOCK, JR., TITONE and BELLACOSA. Taking no part: Judges SIMONS and ALEXANDER.


Summaries of

People v. Paul

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Apr 2, 1992
592 N.E.2d 795 (N.Y. 1992)
Case details for

People v. Paul

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. THOMAS E. PAUL…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Apr 2, 1992

Citations

592 N.E.2d 795 (N.Y. 1992)
592 N.E.2d 795
583 N.Y.S.2d 187

Citing Cases

Tone v. Song Mountain Ski Ctr.

Nor does plaintiff provide an expert opinion that based upon the facts here, the operator had time to take an…

Tone v. Song Mountain Ski Ctr.

Nor does plaintiff provide an expert opinion that based upon the facts here, the operator had time to take an…