From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Patterson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 16, 1993
195 A.D.2d 976 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

July 16, 1993

Appeal from the Allegany County Court, Sprague, J.

Present — Callahan, J.P., Balio, Doerr, Boomer and Boehm, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court properly declined to adjudicate defendant a youthful offender. Defendant, 15 years of age, pleaded guilty to burglary in the first degree. During the plea colloquy, defendant admitted that he unlawfully entered the residence of an elderly woman with the intention of committing larceny. He was armed with a loaded rifle, which he pointed at the victim, and he threatened to shoot the victim in the kneecaps. He stole money from the victim's pocket, abducted her and forced her to withdraw money at the drive-in window of her bank and give it to him. Because defendant was convicted of an armed felony and there were no mitigating circumstances bearing directly on the manner in which the crime was committed, and because defendant's participation in the crime was not relatively minor, defendant was not eligible for adjudication as a youthful offender (see, CPL 720.10 [a]; [3]). Under all of the circumstances, his sentence of two to six years imprisonment is not harsh and excessive.


Summaries of

People v. Patterson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 16, 1993
195 A.D.2d 976 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

People v. Patterson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JASON W. PATTERSON…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 16, 1993

Citations

195 A.D.2d 976 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
600 N.Y.S.2d 877

Citing Cases

People v. Luisi

We do not agree and, therefore, affirm. Defendant stood convicted of robbery in the first degree, an armed…

People v. Garcia

We reject the contention that the court abused its discretion in denying defendant youthful offender status.…