From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Paternoster

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 27, 1988
140 A.D.2d 995 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Opinion

May 27, 1988

Appeal from the Oneida County Court, Murad, J.

Present — Doerr, J.P., Boomer, Green and Lawton, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The evidence was sufficient to show that when defendant unlawfully entered the buildings he intended to commit the crime of larceny therein.

The prosecutor's delay in providing defendant with the statements made by the witness did not constitute reversible error because no prejudice to the defense accrued thereby (see, People v Ranghelle, 69 N.Y.2d 56).


Summaries of

People v. Paternoster

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 27, 1988
140 A.D.2d 995 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)
Case details for

People v. Paternoster

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JAMES V. PATERNOSTER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 27, 1988

Citations

140 A.D.2d 995 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988)

Citing Cases

People v. Violante

The brief reference to marihuana use could not have swayed the jury into convicting defendant of murder. Also…