From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Papineau

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 16, 1969
31 A.D.2d 781 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)

Opinion

January 16, 1969

Appeal from the Onondaga County Court.

Present — Bastow, P.J., Del Vecchio, Marsh, Witmer and Henry, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting her of attempted robbery, first degree, and assault, second degree. Upon the trial a police officer testified, without objection, to a prior identification of the defendant made by the victim and an eyewitness. We agree that this was error. ( People v. Trowbridge, 305 N.Y. 471; People v. Caserta, 19 N.Y.2d 18.) No objection having been made to this proof, however, the question was not preserved for review. ( People v. Ross, 21 N.Y.2d 258.) We may of course reverse in the interest of justice ( People v. Kelly, 12 N.Y.2d 248) but we decline to exercise that power on the present record. (Cf. People v. Phillips, 27 A.D.2d 981.) We have considered defendant's other contentions and find them without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Papineau

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jan 16, 1969
31 A.D.2d 781 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)
Case details for

People v. Papineau

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. BEVERLY J. PAPINEAU…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jan 16, 1969

Citations

31 A.D.2d 781 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)

Citing Cases

People v. Sabin

Judgment unanimously affirmed. (See Memorandum in People v. Papineau, 31 A.D.2d 781, decided concurrently…

People v. Jones

However, we decline to exercise that power on the present record where the proof overwhelmingly established…