Opinion
06-30-2016
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Nadine PANTON, Appellant.
Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York City (Robin Nichinsky of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York City (David P. Stromes of counsel), and Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney, Bronx (Joseph N. Ferdenzi, Peter D. Coddington and T. Charles Won of counsel), for respondent.
Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York City (Robin Nichinsky of counsel), for appellant.
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York City (David P. Stromes of counsel), and Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney, Bronx (Joseph N. Ferdenzi, Peter D. Coddington and T. Charles Won of counsel), for respondent.
OPINION OF THE COURT
MEMORANDUM.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Defendant contends that police engaged in improper pre-Miranda custodial interrogation and, as a result, her post-Miranda written and video statements should have been suppressed. Because defendant did not raise this particular ground either in her suppression motion or at the hearing, it is unpreserved for our review (see People v. Gonzalez, 55 N.Y.2d 887, 888, 449 N.Y.S.2d 18, 433 N.E.2d 1266 [1982] ).
We have considered defendant's remaining contention and find it to be without merit.
Chief Judge DiFIORE and Judges PIGOTT, RIVERA, ABDUS–SALAAM, STEIN, FAHEY and GARCIA concur.
Order affirmed, in a memorandum.