From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Pacheco

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 19, 2002
292 A.D.2d 242 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

512

March 19, 2002.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Budd Goodman, J.), rendered July 30, 1998, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of rape in the first degree, and sentencing him to a term of 3½ to 7 years, unanimously affirmed.

HOPE KORENSTEIN, for respondent.

LOUIS S. RUSSI, for defendant-appellant.

Before: Williams, P.J., Tom, Saxe, Rosenberger, Wallach, JJ.


Defendant's suppression motion was properly denied. The record supports the court's finding that there was no violation of Payton v. New York ( 445 U.S. 573) since the police entry into defendant's apartment was based on the consent of a person who reasonably appeared to have authority to consent. The complainant expressly stated the basis for her authority to consent, namely, that she lived in the apartment, and the circumstances were not such as to obligate the police to inquire further (see, People v. Adams, 53 N.Y.2d 1, 9-11, cert denied 454 U.S. 854). Therefore, suppression of defendant's voluntary statements was properly denied.

The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Issues of credibility, including the weight to be given the complainant's background and the minor inconsistencies in her testimony, were properly considered by the jury and there is no basis upon which to disturb its determinations.

Defendant's remaining contentions are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would reject them.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

People v. Pacheco

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 19, 2002
292 A.D.2d 242 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

People v. Pacheco

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, v. EDUARDO PACHECO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 19, 2002

Citations

292 A.D.2d 242 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
738 N.Y.S.2d 576

Citing Cases

People v. Williams

Accordingly, Hewlett had actual and apparent authority to allow the police to enter and search the apartment.…

People v. Williams

Accordingly, Hewlett had actual and apparent authority to allow the police to enter and search the apartment.…