From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Ortiz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 17, 1992
188 A.D.2d 406 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

December 17, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lawrence J. Tonetti, J.).


After directing defendant to pull over for a traffic infraction, a police officer viewed a revolver in the defendant's waist band as defendant reached across the vehicle to the glove compartment in order to obtain the identification papers. After the officer immediately alerted his partner, the defendant spontaneously stated "I have a gun in my waistband." The trial court denied defendant's motion to suppress the physical evidence and the statement.

We reject defendant's contention that the officer's testimony was not credible as a matter of law, and note that deference is to be accorded to the hearing court's resolution of issues of credibility (People v Garafolo, 44 A.D.2d 86, 88). We also find that the defendant's statement was spontaneous and not the product of expressed questioning or its functional equivalent (see, People v Bryant, 59 N.Y.2d 786, 788).

Concur — Milonas, J.P., Ellerin, Kupferman, Ross and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Ortiz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 17, 1992
188 A.D.2d 406 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

People v. Ortiz

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LUIS ORTIZ, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 17, 1992

Citations

188 A.D.2d 406 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
591 N.Y.S.2d 398

Citing Cases

People v. Carver

Although defendant was not free to leave at that point, the statements were not the product of express…