From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Ortiz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 2, 2003
305 A.D.2d 979 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

KA 01-02132

May 2, 2003.

Appeal from an order of Cayuga County Court (Contiguglia, J.), entered December 18, 2001, which granted defendant's motion and set aside the jury verdict pursuant to CPL 330.30.

JAMES B. VARGASON, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, AUBURN (CHRISTOPHER T. VALDINA OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

EDDIE ORTIZ, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT PRO SE.

DAVID P. ELKOVITCH, AUBURN, FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

PRESENT: GREEN, J.P., PINE, HURLBUTT, AND LAWTON, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law, the motion is denied, the verdict is reinstated and the matter is remitted to Cayuga County Court for sentencing.

Memorandum:

We agree with the People that County Court erred in granting defendant's motion and setting aside the jury verdict pursuant to CPL 330.30. In granting the motion, the court found that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence. That was error. In deciding a motion pursuant to CPL 330.30, a trial judge is precluded "from reweighing evidence, a factual review" ( People v Ventura, 66 N.Y.2d 693, 695; see People v. Carter, 63 N.Y.2d 530, 536-538; People v. Carthens, 171 A.D.2d 387, 391-392). The verdict could have been set aside pursuant to CPL 330.30 "only if based upon insufficient evidence or evidence which as a matter of law was inadequate to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt" ( Carter, 63 N.Y.2d at 537), and that cannot be said of the verdict herein. The jury found defendant guilty of aggravated harassment of an employee by an inmate (Penal Law former 240.32), and the evidence that the liquid that struck the correction officer smelled of urine, together with the other evidence submitted by the People, is legally sufficient to support a conviction of that crime. Consequently, we reverse the order, deny the motion, reinstate the verdict and remit the matter to Cayuga County Court for sentencing.


Summaries of

People v. Ortiz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 2, 2003
305 A.D.2d 979 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

People v. Ortiz

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. EDDIE ORTIZ…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 2, 2003

Citations

305 A.D.2d 979 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
758 N.Y.S.2d 566

Citing Cases

People v. Burkett

In addition, the court did not err in admitting evidence of an uncharged crime or bad act committed by…

Ortiz v. Connolly

Ortiz timely appealed to the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, which affirmed his conviction in a…