From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Orenzo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 28, 1994
202 A.D.2d 693 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

March 28, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gerges, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

In the early morning hours of April 6, 1991, the defendant, encouraged by the codefendant Jose Santiago, chased a third man into a bodega on Fulton Street in Brooklyn, and shot him with a handgun. The victim eventually died of the gunshot wound to his head and brain.

In the challenge to his conviction, the defendant claims that he was deprived of a fair trial because of the prosecutor's comments during summation. The defendant's claims are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit (see, People v Santiago, 199 A.D.2d 290; CPL 470.05; People v. Fleming, 70 N.Y.2d 947; People v. Balls, 69 N.Y.2d 641, 642; People v. Nuccie, 57 N.Y.2d 818, 819; People v. Galloway, 54 N.Y.2d 396, 401; People v. Arce, 42 N.Y.2d 179, 190).

Finally, the defendant's sentence is not excessive (see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80). Balletta, J.P., Ritter, Copertino and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Orenzo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 28, 1994
202 A.D.2d 693 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

People v. Orenzo

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JUAN ORENZO, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 28, 1994

Citations

202 A.D.2d 693 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
610 N.Y.S.2d 828

Citing Cases

People v. Orengo

On appeal, the defendant, inter alia, challenged his sentence as excessive; he did not explicitly raise his…