Summary
In People v. O'Neill (117 App. Div. 826) this court, by GAYNOR, J., said: "By the charter of the city of New York a city magistrate may not hold a court of Special Sessions and try misdemeanors as formerly. He may only try, but not as a court, charges of those lesser things which do not amount to misdemeanors, of which vagrancy, or being a disorderly person, or that a child begs, or is without proper guardianship, and the like, are examples (Code Crim. Proc. §§ 887, 899; Penal Code, § 291).
Summary of this case from People ex Rel. Parker v. Mother SuperiorOpinion
March 1, 1907.
Walter Lester Glenney, for the appellant.
Peter P. Smith [ John F. Clarke with him on the brief], for the respondent.
By the charter of the city of New York a city magistrate may not hold a court of Special Sessions and try misdemeanors as formerly. He may only try, but not as a court, charges of those lesser things which do not amount to misdemeanors, of which vagrancy, or being a disorderly person, or that a child begs, or is without proper guardianship, and the like, are examples (Code Crim. Pro. secs. 887, 899; Penal Code, sec. 291). These are not crimes but only conditions. Such courts of Special Sessions have to be held by justices specially appointed for that purpose, and three must sit to make a court (Title 3; sec. 1405 et seq.). And appeals from such courts are the same as from judgments on indict ments, viz., to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court (sec. 1414).
By subsequent sections of this same title of the charter, which came in as amendments or additions after the charter was in effect, the justices of Special Sessions of the first division (Manhattan and Bronx boroughs), and those of the second division (Brooklyn, Queens and Richmond boroughs), are respectively required to assign "a separate part for the hearing and disposition of cases heretofore within the jurisdiction of city magistrates involving the trial or commitment of children, which part shall be called the children's court." The children are to be under 16 years of age. It is then provided that the "justice or justices" holding such a court shall "have all the powers, duties and jurisdiction now possessed by the city magistrates" "in all such cases" and shall "supersede" such magistrates therein. This, be it observed, relates only to magisterial powers and duties, which it confers on the justices of the Special Sessions courts, whereas theretofore they could not act as magistrates, but only as a court of Special Sessions. It is also provided that in the trial of such children on charges of misdemeanors one of such justices instead of three may constitute such children's court of Special Sessions unless the prosecution or the defense objects thereto (secs. 1418, 1419).
In the foregoing system no appeals are provided for by the city charter except by section 1414, and that only provides for appeals from convictions by courts of Special Sessions. Other appeals, i.e., from orders or judgments of magistrates are left as they were. The transfer of the trial of those lesser charges not amounting to crimes against such children from the city magistrates, who theretofore tried them, to the justices of the children's court of Special Sessions, as magistrates — i.e. from one set of magistrates to another set — did not change the method of appeal in such cases. Section 749 of the Code of Criminal Procedure regulates appeals from magistrates, and requires them to be to the county court.
The order should be reversed, and the appeal heard in the county court.
HIRSCHBERG, P.J., JENKS, RICH and MILLER, JJ., concurred.
Order of the County Court of Kings county reversed and appeal directed to be heard in said court.