From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Oliver

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 7, 1980
75 A.D.2d 590 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

Opinion

April 7, 1980


Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered March 31, 1978, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed, on the law, and case remanded to Criminal Term with a direction that the matter be transferred to the Family Court, Kings County. Defendant was arrested and indicted for the crimes of reckless endangerment in the first degree, coercion in the first degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, arising out of an incident during which he threatened to use a kitchen knife to harm two of his children if a Family Court warrant was served upon him by police officers who had accompanied his wife to his apartment. The jury found the defendant guilty only of possession of a weapon in the third degree. Prior to its amendment and at the time of this offense, section 812 FCT of the Family Court Act provided that the Family Court had "exclusive original jurisdiction * * * over any proceeding concerning acts which would constitute disorderly conduct, harassment, menacing, reckless endangerment, an assault or an attempt assault between spouses or between parent and child or between members of the same family or household." Although the defendant was indicted for coercion and criminal possession of a weapon, these crimes were inextricably related by a common element to the reckless endangerment charge, and thus were within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Family Court (see People v Jones, 59 A.D.2d 617). In addition, the People's assertion that a family dispute was not involved here, but rather an attempt by the defendant to resist an arrest, involves a hypertechnical and unrealistic reading of the statute. The warrant of arrest was itself related to marital problems which the defendant and his wife were having. Therefore, the appropriate forum for the entire matter, in the first instance, was the Family Court (see People v. Johnson, 20 N.Y.2d 220). Rabin, J.P., Gulotta, Cohalan and O'Connor, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Oliver

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 7, 1980
75 A.D.2d 590 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)
Case details for

People v. Oliver

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DARNELL OLIVER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 7, 1980

Citations

75 A.D.2d 590 (N.Y. App. Div. 1980)

Citing Cases

People v. Singleton

In addition to these enumerated "family offenses", case law has extended the jurisdiction of the Family Court…

People v. Baumann

Significantly, however, it did not hold that the listing in either the CPL or Family Court Act provisions was…