From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. O'Harrow

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Jun 14, 2013
107 A.D.3d 1601 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-06-14

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. William O'HARROW, Defendant–Appellant. (Appeal No. 1.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Niagara County Court (Sara S. Farkas, J.), renderedOctober 5, 2011. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted burglary in the second degree and burglary in the third degree. David J. Farrugia, Public Defender, Lockport (Mary–Jean Bowman of Counsel), for Defendant–Appellant. Michael J. Violante, District Attorney, Lockport (Laura T. Bittner of Counsel), for Respondent.


Appeal from a judgment of the Niagara County Court (Sara S. Farkas, J.), renderedOctober 5, 2011. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted burglary in the second degree and burglary in the third degree.
David J. Farrugia, Public Defender, Lockport (Mary–Jean Bowman of Counsel), for Defendant–Appellant. Michael J. Violante, District Attorney, Lockport (Laura T. Bittner of Counsel), for Respondent.
MEMORANDUM:

In appeal No. 1, defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of attempted burglary in the second degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 140.25[2] ), and burglary in the third degree (§ 140.20). In appeal No. 2, he appeals from a resentence with respect to the conviction of burglary in the third degree. Contrary to defendant's contention, the record establishes that he knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived the right to appeal ( see generally People v. Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 256, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145), and that valid waiver forecloses any challenge by defendant to the severity of the sentence in each appeal ( see id. at 255, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145;see generally People v. Lococo, 92 N.Y.2d 825, 827, 677 N.Y.S.2d 57, 699 N.E.2d 416;People v. Hidalgo, 91 N.Y.2d 733, 737, 675 N.Y.S.2d 327, 698 N.E.2d 46).

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal from the judgment insofar as it imposed sentence on the conviction of burglary in the third degree is unanimously dismissed and the judgment is otherwise affirmed.

CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, SCONIERS, VALENTINO, and WHALEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. O'Harrow

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Jun 14, 2013
107 A.D.3d 1601 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

People v. O'Harrow

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. William O'HARROW…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Jun 14, 2013

Citations

107 A.D.3d 1601 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
966 N.Y.S.2d 730
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 4524

Citing Cases

People v. Weathington

We otherwise affirm the judgment in appeal No. 1 and affirm the resentence in appeal No. 2. Contrary to…

People v. Weathington

We note at the outset that, inasmuch as the sentence in appeal No. 1 was superseded by the resentence in…