Opinion
106171
12-18-2014
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Victor OGINSKI, Appellant.
Paul J. Connolly, Delmar, for appellant. Robert M. Carney, District Attorney, Schenectady (Gerald A. Dwyer of counsel), for respondent.
Paul J. Connolly, Delmar, for appellant.
Robert M. Carney, District Attorney, Schenectady (Gerald A. Dwyer of counsel), for respondent.
Before: PETERS, P.J., ROSE, EGAN JR. and LYNCH, JJ.
Opinion
PETERS, P.J.
Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schenectady County (Giardino, J.), rendered July 25, 2013, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of sexual abuse in the first degree and endangering the welfare of a child.
Defendant pleaded guilty to sexual abuse in the first degree and endangering the welfare of a child and waived his right to appeal. County Court thereafter sentenced him to the agreed-upon sentence of three years in prison to be followed by seven years of postrelease supervision. Defendant now appeals and we affirm.
Contrary to defendant's contention, based upon our review of the plea colloquy, as well as the counseled written waiver of appeal he executed in open court, we conclude that defendant was informed that the right to appeal was separate from the rights automatically forfeited by a guilty plea and that he knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waived the right to appeal his conviction and sentence (see People v. Munger, 117 A.D.3d 1343, 1343, 987 N.Y.S.2d 118 [2014], lv. denied 23 N.Y.3d 1040, 993 N.Y.S.2d 254, 17 N.E.3d 509 [2014] ; People v. Long, 117 A.D.3d 1326, 1326, 986 N.Y.S.2d 670 [2014], lv. denied 24 N.Y.3d 1003, 997 N.Y.S.2d 121, 21 N.E.3d 573 [2014] ). In light of his valid appeal waiver, defendant is precluded from challenging his sentence as harsh and excessive (see People v. Fligger, 117 A.D.3d 1343, 1344, 986 N.Y.S.2d 689 [2014], lv. denied 23 N.Y.3d 1061, 994 N.Y.S.2d 321, 18 N.E.3d 1142 [2014] ; People v. Waldron, 115 A.D.3d 1116, 1117, 982 N.Y.S.2d 411 [2014], lv. denied 23 N.Y.3d 969, 988 N.Y.S.2d 576, 11 N.E.3d 726 [2014] ).
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
ROSE, EGAN JR. and LYNCH, JJ., concur.