From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Ogden

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 21, 1998
250 A.D.2d 1001 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

May 21, 1998

Appeal from the County Court of Chemung County (Castellino, J.)


The sole contention raised by defendant on this appeal is that County Court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained as the result of an allegedly impermissible stop of his vehicle. We disagree. State Trooper Michael Friebis testified at the Huntley hearing ( see, People v. Huntley, 15 N.Y.2d 72) that on July 30, 1995, at approximately 10:50 P.M., he stopped defendant after observing, in his rearview mirror, defendants vehicle straddling the double-yellow line of State Route 223 in the Town of Horseheads, Chemung County, for approximately three seconds in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1128 Veh. Traf. (a). This testimony, credited by County Court, provided an adequate basis for its determination that Friebis reasonably suspected that defendant violated Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1128 Veh. Traf. (a), a permissible basis for the stop of defendants vehicle ( see, People v. Lamb, 235 A.D.2d 829, 830).

Mikoll, J.P., White, Spain and Carpinello, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Ogden

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 21, 1998
250 A.D.2d 1001 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

People v. Ogden

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. THOMAS OGDEN, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 21, 1998

Citations

250 A.D.2d 1001 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
673 N.Y.S.2d 249

Citing Cases

People v. Smith

At that point, they had probable cause to believe that defendant had committed a traffic infraction. People…

People v. Matos

Defendant contends that crossing the double yellow lines in these circumstances is not unlawful, and in any…