Opinion
December 22, 1986
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kooper, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the court admitted testimony which amounted to impermissible bolstering was not preserved for review as a matter of law (see, CPL 470.05; People v Thomas, 50 N.Y.2d 467; People v. Cummings, 109 A.D.2d 748), and in view of the overwhelming evidence of the defendant's guilt, we decline to invoke our interest of justice jurisdiction to review it.
Finally, we decline to disturb the sentence imposed (see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80). Mollen, P.J., Mangano, Niehoff and Weinstein, JJ., concur.