From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Nunez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 28, 1992
182 A.D.2d 575 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

April 28, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Thomas B. Galligan, J.).


Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Thomas B. Galligan, J.), entered May 18, 1990, which denied defendant's CPL article 440 motion to vacate his conviction and set aside his sentence, unanimously affirmed.

Application by appellant's counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 U.S. 738; People v Saunders, 52 A.D.2d 833). We have reviewed the record and agree with appellant's assigned counsel that there are no non-frivolous points which could be raised on appeal. We also find meritless the arguments raised in defendant's pro se supplemental brief.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Carro, Kupferman, Kassal and Smith, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Nunez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 28, 1992
182 A.D.2d 575 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

People v. Nunez

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RAFAEL NUNEZ, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 28, 1992

Citations

182 A.D.2d 575 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
582 N.Y.S.2d 433

Citing Cases

People v. Dillard

We nonetheless conclude that defendant's contention is without merit. Viewing the evidence in the light most…