From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Nunez

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Dec 5, 2013
112 A.D.3d 437 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)

Opinion

2013-12-5

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Darwin NUNEZ, Defendant–Appellant.

Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Julia Busetti of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Emily L. Auletta of counsel), for respondent.


Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Julia Busetti of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Emily L. Auletta of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles H. Solomon, J.), entered on or about July 17, 2012, which adjudicated defendant a level two sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art. 6–C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Regardless of whether the court properly assessed defendant 15 points for infliction of physical injury, defendant still qualifies as a level two offender, and there is no basis for a discretionary downward departure to level one ( see People v. Pettigrew, 14 N.Y.3d 406, 409, 901 N.Y.S.2d 569, 927 N.E.2d 1053 [2010] ). The underlying offense, committed against a child, was serious, and the mitigating factors cited by defendant were generally taken into account by the risk assessment instrument. TOM, J.P., FRIEDMAN, RENWICK, FEINMAN, CLARK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Nunez

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Dec 5, 2013
112 A.D.3d 437 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
Case details for

People v. Nunez

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Darwin NUNEZ…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 5, 2013

Citations

112 A.D.3d 437 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)
112 A.D.3d 437
2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 8116