From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Novak

Supreme Court of Michigan
Oct 14, 2005
474 Mich. 883 (Mich. 2005)

Opinion

No. 128223.

October 14, 2005.


Summary Dispositions

SC: 128223, COA: 259543.

Pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we remand this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted of (1) whether defendant's use of a toy gun to commit the armed robbery is accounted for by the sentencing guidelines, MCL 777.31, (2) in any event, whether the facts of this case constitute substantial and compelling reasons to depart from the sentencing guidelines range, and (3) if so, whether the extent of the trial court's departure was justified by those reasons. See MCL 769.34(3); People v. Babcock, 469 Mich 247 (2003). We do not retain jurisdiction.


I dissent from the order remanding this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted. Applying the analysis of my partial dissent and partial concurrence in People v. Babcock, 469 Mich 247, 280-284 (2003), I would deny leave. The trial court satisfied the requirement for "a substantial and compelling reason" for its departure from the sentencing guidelines, and its decision did not venture beyond the range of principled outcomes under the circumstances.


Summaries of

People v. Novak

Supreme Court of Michigan
Oct 14, 2005
474 Mich. 883 (Mich. 2005)
Case details for

People v. Novak

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. THEODORE HAROLD…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Oct 14, 2005

Citations

474 Mich. 883 (Mich. 2005)
704 N.W.2d 701