From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Noisette

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 9th and 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
Oct 24, 2019
65 Misc. 3d 142 (N.Y. App. Term 2019)

Opinion

2017-1968 W CR

10-24-2019

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Stanley NOISETTE, Appellant.

Ronnie James Ritz, for appellant. Westchester County District Attorney, for respondent (no brief filed).


Ronnie James Ritz, for appellant.

Westchester County District Attorney, for respondent (no brief filed).

PRESENT: TERRY JANE RUDERMAN, J.P., THOMAS A. ADAMS, BRUCE E. TOLBERT, JJ

ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v. California (386 US 738 [1967] ), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id. ; People v. Murray , 169 AD3d 227 [2019] ; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.] , 89 AD3d 252 [2011] ; People v. Paige , 54 AD2d 631 [1976] ; cf. People v. Gonzalez , 47 NY2d 606 [1979] ).

RUDERMAN, J.P., ADAMS and TOLBERT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Noisette

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 9th and 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
Oct 24, 2019
65 Misc. 3d 142 (N.Y. App. Term 2019)
Case details for

People v. Noisette

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Stanley Noisette…

Court:SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 9th and 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS

Date published: Oct 24, 2019

Citations

65 Misc. 3d 142 (N.Y. App. Term 2019)
2019 N.Y. Slip Op. 51729
119 N.Y.S.3d 379