From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Newton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 2, 1995
221 A.D.2d 167 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

November 2, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Nicholas Iacovetta, J.).


Defendant's constitutional speedy trial motion was properly denied ( People v Taranovich, 37 N.Y.2d 442, 445). "The record indicates that substantial parts of the [22-month] delay were justified, mostly due to defendant's pretrial applications and motions" ( People v Garcia, 208 A.D.2d 425, lv denied 84 N.Y.2d 1031), and relatively little delay was attributable to the People.

We have considered defendant's remaining argument and find it to be without merit.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Ellerin, Ross, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Newton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 2, 1995
221 A.D.2d 167 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Newton

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DERRICK NEWTON, Also…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 2, 1995

Citations

221 A.D.2d 167 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
632 N.Y.S.2d 962

Citing Cases

People v. Reynolds

The contested time periods relevant to defendant's CPL 30.30 speedy trial motion were properly excluded…

People v. Polite

Nor did the allegations set forth in defendant's supplemental motion papers establish a violation of his…