From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Nedoroscik

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 5, 1991
178 A.D.2d 684 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

December 5, 1991

Appeal from the County Court of Albany County (Turner, Jr., J.).


The judgment should be affirmed. There was testimony at trial that defendant had been drinking and that he drove the car after purchasing more beer. The police observed the car heading south in a northbound lane in an erratic fashion; after pursuing the car, defendant was identified as fleeing from the driver's side. Once taken into custody defendant was observed to have bloodshot eyes, alcohol on his breath, slurred speech and poor motor control. This evidence was legally sufficient to establish defendant's guilt of driving while intoxicated beyond a reasonable doubt (see, People v Nosek, 160 A.D.2d 898; People v Ritgers, 158 A.D.2d 628). As to the aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle charge, insofar as defendant was properly convicted of driving while intoxicated and the parties stipulated that defendant's license was revoked at the time of his arrest, there was legally sufficient evidence to support the finding of guilt on that charge as well (see, Vehicle and Traffic Law § 511).

Weiss, J.P., Mikoll, Yesawich Jr., Levine and Mercure, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Nedoroscik

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 5, 1991
178 A.D.2d 684 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

People v. Nedoroscik

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. FRANK W. NEDOROSCIK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 5, 1991

Citations

178 A.D.2d 684 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
577 N.Y.S.2d 157

Citing Cases

People v. Tracy (William)

Moreover, prior to the stop, the police officer observed defendant's vehicle hit the curb while making a wide…

People v. Rutkowski

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, for…