From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Nathan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 14, 2010
79 A.D.3d 910 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. 2009-10026.

December 14, 2010.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Hayes, J.), rendered October 16, 2009, convicting her of burglary in the third degree, upon her plea of guilty, and imposing sentence, including restitution in the sum of $878.50.

Arza Feldman, Uniondale, N.Y., for appellant.

William V. Grady, District Attorney, Poughkeepsie, N.Y. (Joan H. McCarthy of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Fisher, J.P., Dillon, Balkin, Chambers and Sgroi, JJ.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant maintains that the restitution component of the judgment in the sum of $878.50 should be vacated because the County Court failed to fix the time and manner of performance on the record at the time of sentencing. This claim is unpreserved for appellate review ( see CPL 470.05; People v Toxey, 86 NY2d 725, 726; People v Bruno, 73 AD3d 941, 942; People v Harris, 72 AD3d 1110, 1112). In any event, contrary to the defendant's contention, the record reveals that the County Court fixed the amount of restitution and directed the manner of performance at sentencing ( see CPL 420.10; Penal Law § 60.27; People v Brown, 70 AD3d 1378, 1379; cf. People v Jackson, 180 AD2d 755).


Summaries of

People v. Nathan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 14, 2010
79 A.D.3d 910 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

People v. Nathan

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ANGELA NATHAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 14, 2010

Citations

79 A.D.3d 910 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 9292
912 N.Y.S.2d 412

Citing Cases

People v. Woods

We decline to exercise our interest of justice jurisdiction to review the defendant's contentions regarding…