From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Murphy

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department
Feb 16, 2022
No. 2022-01044 (N.Y. App. Div. Feb. 16, 2022)

Opinion

2022-01044 Ind. 8742/12

02-16-2022

The People of the State of New York, respondent, v. Randolph Murphy, appellant.

Randolph Murphy, Napanoch, NY, appellant pro se. Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove, Amy Appelbaum, and Daniel Berman of counsel), for respondent.


Randolph Murphy, Napanoch, NY, appellant pro se.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove, Amy Appelbaum, and Daniel Berman of counsel), for respondent.

MARK C. DILLON, J.P., VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, SHERI S. ROMAN, JOSEPH A. ZAYAS, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated June 14, 2017 (People v Murphy, 151 A.D.3d 888), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered May 1, 2014.

ORDERED that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel (see Jones v Barnes, 463 U.S. 745; People v Stultz, 2 N.Y.3d 277).

DILLON, J.P., BRATHWAITE NELSON, ROMAN and ZAYAS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Murphy

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department
Feb 16, 2022
No. 2022-01044 (N.Y. App. Div. Feb. 16, 2022)
Case details for

People v. Murphy

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, respondent, v. Randolph Murphy…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department

Date published: Feb 16, 2022

Citations

No. 2022-01044 (N.Y. App. Div. Feb. 16, 2022)