People v. Murphy

Full title: THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. TASAUNA DANIELLE MURPHY…

Court: California Court of Appeals, Third District, Sacramento

Date published: Jan 17, 2006

No. C046923 (Cal. Ct. App. Jan. 17, 2006)

Opinion

Page 642c

135 Cal.App.4th 642c __ Cal.Rptr.3d __ THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. TASAUNA DANIELLE MURPHY, Defendant and Appellant. C046923 California Court of Appeal, Third District, Sacramento January 17, 2006

Super. Ct. No. 03F10757.

It is ordered that the opinion filed in this case on December 20, 2005, be modified as follows:

The second sentence of the second full paragraph on page 14 of the opinion [134 Cal.App.4th 1508, advance opinion, 3d par.], beginning with the words “This is because” and ending with the words “possession of another” shall be deleted, and the following sentence inserted in its place:

“For example, one can broker a sale of a controlled substance that is within the exclusive possession of another.”

This modification does not change the judgment.

Appellant’s petition for rehearing is denied.