From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Murphy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 6, 1999
267 A.D.2d 254 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

Argued November 1, 1999

December 6, 1999

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (LaCava, J.), rendered September 24, 1998, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

Stephen J. Pittari, White Plains, N.Y. (Jacqueline F. Oliva of counsel), for appellant.

Jeanine Pirro, District Attorney, White Plains, N.Y. (Richard Anthony Portale, Bruce Edward Kelly, and Peter H. Carbone of counsel), for respondent.

GUY JAMES MANGANO, P.J., DAVID S. RITTER, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, HOWARD MILLER, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The hearing court properly determined that the police officer had reasonable suspicion to stop and detain the defendant for questioning given the police officer's experience and training, the large number of drug sales in the area, and his view of a hand-to-hand transaction wherein the defendant received money for a small item (see, People v. Hollman, 79 N.Y.2d 181, 184-185, 191 ;People v. DeBour, 40 N.Y.2d 210, 223 ; see also, People v. Jones, 90 N.Y.2d 835, 836-837 ; People v. McRay, 51 N.Y.2d 594, 605 ; People v. Hoover, 236 A.D.2d 626, 628 ).

By voluntarily removing a purse from his waistband and handing it to the police officer when the officer asked "to see" the purse which was already in plain view, the defendant consented, if not explicitly then tacitly, to the police officer's search of the interior of the purse (see, People v. Gonzalez, 222 A.D.2d 453;People v. Mitchell, 211 A.D.2d 553 ).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.

MANGANO, P.J., RITTER, GOLDSTEIN, and H. MILLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Murphy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 6, 1999
267 A.D.2d 254 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

People v. Murphy

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. CHARLES MURPHY, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 6, 1999

Citations

267 A.D.2d 254 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
699 N.Y.S.2d 443

Citing Cases

People v. Thompson (Willie)

The officer's subsequent demand that defendant display to the officer what he held in his hand was not…

People v. Reeves

In a similar case, another court held that the police only had a common-law right to inquire when the…