People v. Munoz

Full title: THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ERNESTO ANGEL MUNOZ, Defendant…

Court: California Court of Appeals, Fourth District, Third Division

Date published: Apr 20, 2006

No. G034265 (Cal. Ct. App. Apr. 20, 2006)

Opinion

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ERNESTO ANGEL MUNOZ, Defendant and Appellant. G034265 California Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Third Division April 20, 2006

Super. Ct. No. 02NF3540

BEDSWORTH, ACTING P. J.

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on April 17, 2006, be modified in the following particulars:

The word “appointed� should be changed to “retained� in the following four locations:

1. Page 8, in the last line, reading: “defendant’s request to relieve appointed counsel . . . .�

2. Page 9, in the first sentence, reading: “Under that standard, the defendant has the right to discharge appointed counsel with or without cause.�

3. Page 9, line 4, reading: “to relieve appointed counsel must be granted

. . . .�

4. Page 10, last paragraph, line 2, reading: right to effective assistance of counsel by denying his motion to relieve appointed . . . .�

This modification does not effect a change in judgment.

WE CONCUR: MOORE, J. IKOLA, J.