From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Muccigrosso

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 16, 2000
269 A.D.2d 754 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

February 16, 2000

Appeal from Judgment of Erie County Court, DiTullio, J. — Grand Larceny, 4th Degree.

PRESENT: PINE, J. P., HURLBUTT, SCUDDER AND LAWTON, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum:

The determination whether to grant a motion to vacate a plea of is within the sound discretion of the court ( see, CPL .60 [3]; People v. Peavy, 225 A.D.2d 1082, 1083, lv denied 88 883), and County Court did not abuse its discretion in the motion of defendant to vacate his plea of guilty. Although defendant was granted relief from civil disabilities ( see, Correction Law § 702) at sentencing, the court failed to sign the certificate. Contrary to defendant's contention, that failure is not a question of law or issue of fact subject to our review ( see, CPL 470.15). Defendant seeks to compel the court to perform a ministerial act necessary to implement the relief that the court granted him. Because the relief sought is mandamus ( see, Matter of Doczy v. Rotker, 155 A.D.2d 400, 401), defendant's remedy is to commence a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78.


Summaries of

People v. Muccigrosso

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Feb 16, 2000
269 A.D.2d 754 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

People v. Muccigrosso

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. F. PAUL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Feb 16, 2000

Citations

269 A.D.2d 754 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
703 N.Y.S.2d 409

Citing Cases

People v. Schrecengost

Contrary to defendant's contention, the court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant's motion to…

People v. Henderson

This matter returns to us following completion of that hearing, during which the court heard testimony from…