Opinion
December 21, 1951.
In this proceeding appellant moved, as on an application for a writ of coram nobis, to vacate the judgment of conviction of grand larceny in the first degree on the grounds (1) that the conviction depended upon false testimony, which was known to the prosecutor to be false and induced by him; (2) that the falsity of the testimony is shown by statements and writings of the complaining witness made subsequent to the entry of judgment; and (3) that documentary evidence favorable to appellant's defense was unlawfully seized and suppressed, and that other evidence was suppressed. Order of the County Court, Queens County, entered after a hearing, denying the application, affirmed. No opinion. Nolan, P.J., Carswell, Adel, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur. [See post, p. 869.]