From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Moss

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Apr 30, 2021
957 N.W.2d 822 (Mich. 2021)

Opinion

SC: 162208 COA: 338877

04-30-2021

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John Antonya MOSS, Defendant-Appellant.


Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 10, 2020 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on the application. MCR 7.305(H)(1).

The appellant shall file a supplemental brief addressing whether the Court of Appeals erred in concluding on remand that the defendant and the complainant are effectively related by blood for purposes of MCL 750.520d(1)(d), such that there was an adequate factual basis for the defendant's no-contest plea.

The appellant's brief shall be filed by August 30, 2021, with no extensions except upon a showing of good cause. In the brief, citations to the record must provide the appendix page numbers as required by MCR 7.312(B)(1). The appellee shall file a supplemental brief within 21 days of being served with the appellant's brief. A reply, if any, must be filed by the appellant within 14 days of being served with the appellee's brief. The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.

The Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan and the Criminal Defense Attorneys of Michigan are invited to file briefs amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in the determination of the issue presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.


Summaries of

People v. Moss

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
Apr 30, 2021
957 N.W.2d 822 (Mich. 2021)
Case details for

People v. Moss

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JOHN ANTONYA MOSS…

Court:Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Date published: Apr 30, 2021

Citations

957 N.W.2d 822 (Mich. 2021)

Citing Cases

People v. Moss

We ordered oral argument on the application to consider "whether the Court of Appeals erred in concluding on…