From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Morris

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Mar 1, 2017
148 A.D.3d 732 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

03-01-2017

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Regan MORRIS, appellant.

Marianne Karas, Thornwood, NY, for appellant. Anthony A. Scarpino, Jr., District Attorney, White Plains, NY (Hae Jin Liu and Laurie G. Sapakoff of counsel), for respondent.


Marianne Karas, Thornwood, NY, for appellant.

Anthony A. Scarpino, Jr., District Attorney, White Plains, NY (Hae Jin Liu and Laurie G. Sapakoff of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Everett, J.), rendered October 1, 2015, convicting him of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The record demonstrates that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v. Sanders, 25 N.Y.3d 337, 339–342, 12 N.Y.S.3d 593, 34 N.E.3d 344 ; People v. Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 256–257, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145 ). However, the defendant's claim regarding the voluntariness of his plea survives his waiver of the right to appeal (see People v. Seaberg, 74 N.Y.2d 1, 10, 543 N.Y.S.2d 968, 541 N.E.2d 1022 ; People v. Espejo, 145 A.D.3d 1031, 42 N.Y.S.3d 862 ). The decision to permit a defendant to withdraw a previously entered plea of guilty rests within the sound discretion of the court and generally will not be disturbed absent an improvident exercise of discretion (see CPL 220.60[3] ; People v. Espejo, 145 A.D.3d 1031, 42 N.Y.S.3d 862 ). Contrary to the defendant's contention, the County Court providently exercised its discretion in denying, without a hearing, his motion to withdraw his plea of guilty. The record establishes that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered a plea of guilty (see People v. Espejo, 145 A.D.3d 1031, 42 N.Y.S.3d 862 ; People v. Rodriguez, 142 A.D.3d 1189, 1189–1190, 38 N.Y.S.3d 224 ).

Moreover, the defendant was not deprived of the effective assistance of counsel, either during the plea proceedings so as to render his plea involuntary, or with respect to his motion to withdraw his plea of guilty (see People v. Benevento, 91 N.Y.2d 708, 674 N.Y.S.2d 629, 697 N.E.2d 584 ; People v. Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137, 444 N.Y.S.2d 893, 429 N.E.2d 400 ).

The defendant's remaining contention is without merit.

DILLON, J.P., CHAMBERS, SGROI, MALTESE and BARROS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Morris

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Mar 1, 2017
148 A.D.3d 732 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

People v. Morris

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Regan MORRIS, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 1, 2017

Citations

148 A.D.3d 732 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
148 A.D.3d 732

Citing Cases

People v. Corr

60[3]; People v Douglas, 83 AD3d 1092). Here, since the record demonstrates that the defendant's pleas of…

People v. Corr

"The decision to permit a defendant to withdraw a previously entered plea of guilty rests within the sound…