From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Moore

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 11, 1989
156 A.D.2d 478 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

December 11, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lombardo, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's claim that the verdict sheet submitted to the jury was not proper is unpreserved for appellate review since he failed to object to its submission (see, CPL 470.05; People v Battles, 141 A.D.2d 748).

We have examined the defendant's remaining arguments with regard to the court's charge and the prosecutor's conduct, and find them to be either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit (see, CPL 470.05; People v Galloway, 54 N.Y.2d 396, 401; People v Baldo, 107 A.D.2d 751; People v Gonzalez, 133 A.D.2d 123). Mangano, J.P., Thompson, Spatt and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Moore

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 11, 1989
156 A.D.2d 478 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

People v. Moore

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ANTOINE MOORE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 11, 1989

Citations

156 A.D.2d 478 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Citing Cases

People v. Porter

Finally, since the defendant did not object to the submission of the verdict sheet to the jury, his assertion…

People v. Lassiter

Further, and contrary to the defendant's contentions, the evidence adduced on the People's rebuttal case was…