Opinion
02-10-2017
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Artamion J. MOORE, Defendant–Appellant.
Charles T. Noce, Conflict Defender, Rochester (Kimberly J. Czapranski of Counsel), for Defendant–Appellant. Sandra Doorley, District Attorney, Rochester (Daniel Gross of Counsel), for Respondent.
Charles T. Noce, Conflict Defender, Rochester (Kimberly J. Czapranski of Counsel), for Defendant–Appellant.
Sandra Doorley, District Attorney, Rochester (Daniel Gross of Counsel), for Respondent.
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., DeJOSEPH, CURRAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ.
MEMORANDUM:
Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of, inter alia, murder in the second degree (Penal Law § 125.25[1] ). Viewing the evidence in light of the elements of the crimes as charged to the jury (see People v. Danielson, 9 N.Y.3d 342, 349, 849 N.Y.S.2d 480, 880 N.E.2d 1 ), we conclude that the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence (see People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490, 495, 515 N.Y.S.2d 761, 508 N.E.2d 672 ).
At the close of the People's case, defendant moved for a trial order of dismissal, and County Court denied that motion with respect to the charge of murder in the second degree and reserved decision with respect to the remaining charges. The matter was submitted to the jury, which issued a verdict convicting defendant of the charges. The court never ruled on the remainder of the motion. On appeal, defendant contends that the evidence is not legally sufficient to support the charges and thus that the court erred in denying his motion. We do "not address that contention because, in accordance with People v. Concepcion , 17 N.Y.3d 192, 197–198, 929 N.Y.S.2d 541, 953 N.E.2d 779 and People v. LaFontaine , 92 N.Y.2d 470, 474, 682 N.Y.S.2d 671, 705 N.E.2d 663, rearg. denied 93 N.Y.2d 849, 688 N.Y.S.2d 495, 710 N.E.2d 1094, ‘we cannot deem the court's failure to rule on the ... motion as a denial thereof’ " (People v. White, 134 A.D.3d 1414, 1415, 22 N.Y.S.3d 723 ; see People v. Spratley, 96 A.D.3d 1420, 1421, 946 N.Y.S.2d 361 ). We therefore hold the case, reserve decision, and remit the matter to County Court for a ruling on the remainder of the motion.
It is hereby ORDERED that the case is held, the decision is reserved, and the matter is remitted to Monroe County Court for further proceedings.