From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Mojica

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 25, 2001
279 A.D.2d 591 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

January 25, 2001.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lipp, J.), rendered July 8, 1997, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

M. Sue Wycoff, New York, N.Y. (Elizabeth J. Miller and Harold V. Ferguson, Jr., of counsel), for appellant and appellant pro se.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove, Joyce Slevin, and Morgan J. Dennehy of counsel), for respondent.

Before: DAVID S. RITTER, J.P., SONDRA MILLER, WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN, NANCY E. SMITH, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that his Sixth Amendment right to a public trial was abridged when the court asked certain members of the defendant's family to leave the courtroom during the first round of jury selection, to permit prospective jurors to be seated. The defendant`s present contentions were not raised before the court and thus are unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05; People v. Quezada, 218 A.D.2d 819). In any event, the court providently exercised its discretion in light of the limited seating within the courtroom (see, People v. Valentin, 250 A.D.2d 497).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Mojica

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 25, 2001
279 A.D.2d 591 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

People v. Mojica

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., RESPONDENT, v. KENNETH MOJICA, APPELLANT. (Ind. No…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 25, 2001

Citations

279 A.D.2d 591 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
719 N.Y.S.2d 608

Citing Cases

People v. Walston

granted16 N.Y.3d 895, 926 N.Y.S.2d 30, 949 N.E.2d 978;People v. Alvarez, 76 A.D.3d 1098, 908 N.Y.S.2d 249,lv.…

People v. Martin

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. Under the circumstances of this case, where there was limited seating…