From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Misiego

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
Dec 30, 2014
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 51848 (N.Y. App. Term 2014)

Opinion

570718/12

12-30-2014

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Enrique Misiego, Defendant-Appellant.


PRESENT: Lowe, III, P.J., Schoenfeld, Hunter, Jr., JJ.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Robert H. Straus, J.H.O.), rendered June 19, 2012, convicting him, upon a plea of guilty, of criminal trespass in the third degree, and imposing sentence.

Per Curiam.

Judgment of conviction (Robert H. Straus, J.H.O.), rendered June 19, 2012, reversed, on the law, accusatory instrument dismissed, and surcharge, if paid, remitted.

As the People now concede, defendant's conviction must be vacated since the plea record lacks the requisite "affirming showing" that defendant understood and waived his Boykin rights (see Boykin v Alabama, 395 US 238 [1969]; People v Tyrell, 22 NY3d 359 [2013]). Inasmuch as defendant has served his sentence, we dismiss the accusatory instrument in lieu of ordering a new trial, a disposition unopposed by the People.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.

I concur I concur I concur

Decision Date: December 30, 2014


Summaries of

People v. Misiego

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
Dec 30, 2014
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 51848 (N.Y. App. Term 2014)
Case details for

People v. Misiego

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Enrique Misiego…

Court:SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT

Date published: Dec 30, 2014

Citations

2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 51848 (N.Y. App. Term 2014)