From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Mimms

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Oct 28, 2020
187 A.D.3d 1215 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)

Opinion

2018-13413 2018-13414 Ind. Nos. 17-00349, 17-00702

10-28-2020

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Carl S. MIMMS, appellant.

Philip H. Schnabel, Chester, NY, for appellant, and appellant pro se. David M. Hoovler, District Attorney, Middletown, N.Y. (William C. Ghee and Robert H. Middlemiss of counsel), for respondent.


Philip H. Schnabel, Chester, NY, for appellant, and appellant pro se.

David M. Hoovler, District Attorney, Middletown, N.Y. (William C. Ghee and Robert H. Middlemiss of counsel), for respondent.

REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P., JOSEPH J. MALTESE, BETSY BARROS, VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, ANGELA G. IANNACCI, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

Appeals by the defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Orange County (Nicholas DeRosa, J., at plea; William DeProspo, J., at sentencing), both rendered February 14, 2018, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree under Indictment No. 17–00349 and assault in the second degree under Indictment No. 17–00702, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

ORDERED that the judgments are affirmed.

The defendant's contention that his pleas were not knowingly and voluntarily made based upon the County Court's imposition of an enhanced sentence is unpreserved for appellate review, as the defendant did not move to withdraw his pleas prior to being sentenced (see CPL 470.05[2] ; People v. Davis, 186 A.D.3d 852, 127 N.Y.S.3d 777 ).

In any event, the record is clear that the County Court warned the defendant that if he violated the terms of the plea agreement, which included not getting rearrested, the court would not be bound by the initial promised sentence. Based upon the defendant's arrest prior to being sentenced, the court could properly impose an enhanced sentence (see People v. Jenkins, 11 N.Y.3d 282, 288, 869 N.Y.S.2d 370, 898 N.E.2d 553 ; People v. Monk, 186 A.D.3d 623, 126 N.Y.S.3d 666 ). The sentences imposed were not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675 ).

RIVERA, J.P., MALTESE, BARROS, BRATHWAITE NELSON and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Mimms

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Oct 28, 2020
187 A.D.3d 1215 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
Case details for

People v. Mimms

Case Details

Full title:The People of the State of New York, respondent, v. Carl S. Mimms…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Date published: Oct 28, 2020

Citations

187 A.D.3d 1215 (N.Y. App. Div. 2020)
187 A.D.3d 1215
2020 N.Y. Slip Op. 6149

Citing Cases

People v. Johnson

The defendant's contention that she was deprived of due process because the judge who presided over her plea…

People v. Johnson

In any event, the defendant's contention is without merit (see People v Simmons, 169 Misc.2d 525, 528 [Crim…