Opinion
2021–03345 Ind. No. 1336/19
04-06-2022
The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Anthony MILO, appellant.
Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Lynn W.L. Fahey of counsel), for appellant. Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove, Avshalom Yotam, and Andrew S. Ayala of counsel), for respondent.
Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Lynn W.L. Fahey of counsel), for appellant.
Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove, Avshalom Yotam, and Andrew S. Ayala of counsel), for respondent.
COLLEEN D. DUFFY, J.P., ANGELA G. IANNACCI, JOSEPH J. MALTESE, LARA J. GENOVESI, JJ.
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jane C. Tully, J.), imposed April 14, 2021, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the period of postrelease supervision imposed as part of the sentence was excessive.
ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the period of postrelease supervision imposed as part of the sentence was not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675 ).
DUFFY, J.P., IANNACCI, MALTESE and GENOVESI, JJ., concur.