Opinion
July 17, 1995
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Goldstein, J.).
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant argues that a showup, which took place in close temporal and spatial proximity to the robbery, was unduly suggestive. We disagree (see, People v. Johnson, 81 N.Y.2d 828; People v. Holley, 205 A.D.2d 638; People v. Mitchell, 185 A.D.2d 249). Given the totality of circumstances in this case, the arresting officer's questioning of the victim at a showup regarding the identity of his assailant was not improper (see, People v. Duuvon, 77 N.Y.2d 541; People v. Lawhorn, 199 A.D.2d 123). Bracken, J.P., Joy, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.