From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Medina

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 25, 1996
228 A.D.2d 362 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

June 25, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Nicholas Iacovetta, J.).


Upon an independent review of the facts, we see no reason to disturb the jury's determination crediting the testimony of the surveilling police officer that from a rooftop observation post he observed defendant taking money from passersby in exchange for red-capped vials handed to them by defendant's companion, and that of the arresting officer that the vials of drugs recovered from an individual identified by the surveilling officer as a buyer had the same red caps as those recovered from defendant's companion. It was within the jury's province to reject the testimony of defendant's witnesses that defendant was an innocent bystander ( People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490, 495; see, People v. Albelo, 199 A.D.2d 79, lv denied 83 N.Y.2d 802).

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Milonas, Wallach, Ross and Nardelli, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Medina

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 25, 1996
228 A.D.2d 362 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

People v. Medina

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. THOMAS MEDINA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 25, 1996

Citations

228 A.D.2d 362 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
644 N.Y.S.2d 273

Citing Cases

People v. Smith

Memorandum: We reject defendant's contention that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence ( see,…