From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Medina

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 10, 1997
237 A.D.2d 382 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

March 10, 1997.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Clabby, J.), rendered September 19, 1994, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and reckless endangerment in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Before: Rosenblatt, J.P., Miller, Ritter and Goldstein, JJ.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the evidence did not warrant a jury instruction on the defense of temporary and lawful possession of a weapon ( see, People v Banks, 76 NY2d 799). Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the defendant ( see, People v Butts, 72 NY2d 746, 750), there is no reasonable view of the evidence upon which the jury could have found that the defendant had a legal excuse for possessing the weapon and that he had not used it in a dangerous manner ( see, People v Toribio, 216 AD2d 189; People v Kouvaras, 197 AD2d 638; People v Karim, 176 AD2d 670). The uncontroverted evidence established that the defendant fired a gun several times at a crowd of people, injuring two of them. The evidence was thus"` "utterly at odds" `"with any genuine claim of innocent possession ( People v Banks, supra, at 801; quoting People v Snyder, 73 NY2d 900, 902).

The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit.


Summaries of

People v. Medina

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 10, 1997
237 A.D.2d 382 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

People v. Medina

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. BERNARDO MEDINA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 10, 1997

Citations

237 A.D.2d 382 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
655 N.Y.S.2d 430

Citing Cases

People v. Smith

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed. Under the circumstances of this case, the defendant was not entitled…

People v. Pena

The defendant's contention that the Supreme Court erred in declining to instruct the jury on temporary and…