From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. McMilland

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York.
Feb 2, 2018
58 Misc. 3d 153 (N.Y. App. Term 2018)

Opinion

2015–1961 K CR

02-02-2018

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Kevin MCMILLAND, Appellant.

Appellate Advocates (Laura B. Tatelman of counsel), for appellant. Kings County District Attorney (Leonard Joblove and Victor Barall of counsel), for respondent.


Appellate Advocates (Laura B. Tatelman of counsel), for appellant.

Kings County District Attorney (Leonard Joblove and Victor Barall of counsel), for respondent.

PRESENT: MICHAEL L. PESCE, P.J., MICHELLE WESTON, THOMAS P. ALIOTTA, JJ

ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v. California (386 US 738 [1967] ), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id. ; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.] , 89 AD3d 252 [2011] ; People v. Paige , 54 AD2d 631 [1976] ; cf. People v. Gonzalez , 47 NY2d 606 [1979] ).

PESCE, P.J., WESTON and ALIOTTA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. McMilland

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York.
Feb 2, 2018
58 Misc. 3d 153 (N.Y. App. Term 2018)
Case details for

People v. McMilland

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Kevin MCMILLAND…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York.

Date published: Feb 2, 2018

Citations

58 Misc. 3d 153 (N.Y. App. Term 2018)
95 N.Y.S.3d 125