From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. McFarlane

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 11, 1993
189 A.D.2d 785 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

January 11, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Naro, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, his conviction need not be set aside due to the court's failure to provide a missing witness charge as to uncalled police officers who were present at the scene of his arrest. Although the defendant did make a prima facie showing that at least two officers were available to the People and would have had knowledge about a material issue upon which evidence was already in the case (see, People v. Kitching, 78 N.Y.2d 532; People v. Gonzalez, 68 N.Y.2d 424), the court's failure to so charge was harmless. In light of the overwhelming evidence of the defendant's guilt, there was no significant probability that a contrary verdict would have resulted (see, People v. Fields, 76 N.Y.2d 761; People v. Skeeters, 180 A.D.2d 834; People v. Astacio, 173 A.D.2d 834). Sullivan, J.P., Balletta, Eiber and Santucci, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. McFarlane

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 11, 1993
189 A.D.2d 785 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

People v. McFarlane

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ELSWORTH McFARLANE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 11, 1993

Citations

189 A.D.2d 785 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
592 N.Y.S.2d 395

Citing Cases

People v. Osorio

Furthermore, her testimony would have been cumulative of the other evidence. In any event, any error in…

People v. Nazim

Defendant failed to show that these uncalled witnesses, both visitors from California, were available and…