From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. McFarlane

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 26, 2001
288 A.D.2d 493 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

1999-07396

Argued April 23, 2001.

November 26, 2001.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (McDonald, J.), rendered July 26, 1999, convicting him of assault in the second degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, unauthorized use of a motor vehicle in the third degree, and resisting arrest, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Debra E. Baker of counsel), for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, N.Y. (John M. Castellano, Lisa Drury, and Ushir Pandit of counsel), for respondent.

Before: LAWRENCE J. BRACKEN, P.J., SONDRA MILLER, LEO F. McGINITY, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, JJ.


ORDERED that the judgment is modified, on the law, by vacating the conviction for assault in the second degree, vacating the sentence imposed thereon, and dismissing that count of the indictment; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

To sustain a conviction for assault in the second degree pursuant to Penal Law § 120.05(3) there must be proof beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant "[w]ith intent to prevent a * * * police officer * * * from performing a lawful duty * * * cause[d] physical injury to such * * * police officer". Physical injury is defined as an "impairment of physical condition or substantial pain" (Penal Law § 10.00). The evidence adduced was legally insufficient to establish physical injury, i.e., that the police officer suffered substantial pain within the meaning of Penal Law § 10.00(9) (cf., Matter of Philip A., 49 N.Y.2d 198). Moreover, no evidence was adduced that the officer suffered any impairment of physical condition. Consequently, the conviction of assault in the second degree must be vacated.

The defendant's remaining contention is without merit.

BRACKEN, P.J., S. MILLER, McGINITY and LUCIANO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. McFarlane

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 26, 2001
288 A.D.2d 493 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

People v. McFarlane

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. RODWYN McFARLANE, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 26, 2001

Citations

288 A.D.2d 493 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
733 N.Y.S.2d 879

Citing Cases

People v. Park

Consequently, the facts available for consideration on direct appeal are insufficient to permit adequate…